An honest look at family finances
24 Nov
Several times over the last few days I’ve heard on the news how the city is getting ready to lay people off. The reporter always notes lower sales tax revenues and property taxes are the reasons for the city wide layoffs. On the surface that seems reasonable.
But the whole thing rubs me the wrong way. My first thought is “If the city can run on less, then why weren’t they doing this the whole time?“ I mean, you’ve all seen the scene on the side of the road. Three guys standing around while one guy is working. It shows me the government is no different than my neighbor. Spending just because they can, no plan, no restraint, money burning a hole in their municipal pockets. Except I get no secret pleasure when the city has to cut back, like I did when my neighbor put a for sale sign on his Hummer.
Secondly, wouldn’t it be nice of while the private sector was booming the government was holding back. If the government would lay people off while jobs were plentiful and growth was abounding it wouldn’t hurt so much. Those people could easily find jobs. Meanwhile the government could try to mitigate the private sector’s rapid growth. Attempt to hold that pendulum from swinging too far. They could sit back and collect their nice big tax revenues and save (ha. ha.) for times like right now.
Then when that pendulum comes screaming back the other way and the private sector beings to struggle, the government could then inject all their savings into the economy. They could call it a stimulus package if they wanted! They could be hiring right now, rather then laying people off. They could be building roads, expanding programs, spending money, and creating jobs. The government could be helping to fix the economy in a real and local way.
Take my neighborhood for example. My house was built in 2004. Literally a mile away they were also building a new freeway. Now, it should have taken 3 months to build my house. But it took 7 because labor and materials were so hard to come by. We had to wait for concrete for the foundation, then we had to wait for framers to be available, and on and on. If the government had restricted their building they wouldn’t be right in there competing for these precious resources. They could let the private sector have the workers and materials. Imagine if they were building that freeway right now. Think of the jobs they could be providing, of the business they would be helping.
But instead the government is struggling right there with the rest of us. It’s too bad.
pic by: Rick
Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post consider subscribing!
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.
Related posts:
11 Responses for "What the government should be doing during a recession"
Great points! It seems so easy to us, but I think that’s because we’re not so greedy!
I’m confused. You say that the government SHOULD be hiring, but not building a road near your house because they use precious resources. If they stopped building the road there would be layoffs. Isn’t the road a good thing?
I’ve never been involved with the government, but it seems people (the representatives in government in this instance) are less likely to want to save in general. It’s not their money. Why should they care? I really wish I felt like the government had our best interest at heart, but I don’t think that’ll happen until officials can’t be given money by lobbyists and corporations.
Good article!
Stumbled, Dugg, Reddit!
-HIB
To confused: I was saying they should be building it now, not in 2004 when the private sector was doing a lot of building. It would be nice if they were supporting industry when the private sector is not. Rather than competing with the private sector for resources.
My big issue right now is that the government is encouraging us to spend. And worse yet, to do it using debt. The latest TARP plan to support consumer debt is a prime example. The government should be helping us shift our economy from a debt-based one to something that is more sustainable — and better for personal finances.
In upper Michigan there used to be a program called the Civilian Conservation Corps. This program housed and fed guys while they worked on public projects. They learned the skills and were supported while building bridges, roads, houses, parks, whatever to improve the area. Then they had all these new skills they learned that they could go out and find a new job with. Great program until the unions started complaining about these new skilled workers taking all the jobs. *eyeroll*
Now why can’t we ditch welfare and food stamps and have a program like that?
I think a big issue is that divisions in the government are given their budget based on their spending. If they don’t spend the money they are given they will be passed over the next year and not get as much money, it will be sent to someone that will spend it.
This causes them to all TRY to spend all their money, and maybe even more so they can request more the next year. I am not sure how this should be fixed either.
[...] What the government should be doing during a recession [...]
[...] Open Wallet has some ideas as to what the government should be doing during the recession. (I have my own thoughts but I like to keep this blog [...]
[...] What the Government Should Be Doing During a Recession from Wide Open Wallet [...]
[...] Wide Open Wallet: What The Government Should Be Doing During A Recession [...]
Leave a reply